• Skip to content
  • Skip to navigation
Global site
  • Global site
Grant Thorton Logo

Grant Thornton Logo Grant Thornton logo

  • Meet our people
  • Insights
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Careers
  • Locations
  • Business advisory services
  • Financial advisory services
  • Tax
  • Audit
  • Operational advisory
Business advisory services Home
  • NZTE support for businesses impacted by COVID-19
Financial advisory services Home
  • Asia Services Group
  • Business valuations
  • Capital markets
  • Complex and international services
  • Corporate insolvency
  • Debt advisory
  • Expert witness
  • Financial models
  • Forensic and investigation services
  • Independent business review
  • IT forensics
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Raising finance
  • Relationship property services
  • Restructuring and turnaround
  • Transaction advisory
Tax Home
  • Corporate tax
  • Employment tax
  • Global mobility services
  • GST
  • International tax
  • Research and Development
  • Tax compliance
  • Transfer pricing
Audit Home
  • Audit methodology
  • Audit technology
  • Financial reporting advisory
Operational advisory Home
  • Business architecture
  • Internal audit
  • IT advisory
  • IT privacy and security
  • PCI DSS
  • Process improvement
  • Procurement/supply chain
  • Project assurance
  • Risk management
  • Robotic process automation (RPA)
  • Energy and resources
  • Financial services
  • Food and beverage
  • Health and aged care
  • Media and entertainment
  • Not for profit
  • Professional services
  • Public sector
  • Real estate and construction
  1. Grant Thornton New Zealand
  2. Press releases
  3. 2012
  4. Fringe benefits

Fringe benefits

23 Oct 2012
  • Press releases
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012

Weren’t the 80s great?

The best music. Great movies and TV shows. Straight forward video games. OK, maybe not the fashion.

The mid-1980s also saw some radical changes to the New Zealand tax landscape, with the introduction of new regimes that, today, feel like they’ve been with us forever. In particular, Goods and Services Tax was introduced, as was Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT).

The rationale for introducing FBT was quite straight-forward. Employees being paid normal wages and salaries were (and continue to be) taxed through the PAYE system. However, employees whose  remuneration packages included non-cash items were generally not taxed. Such “fringe benefits” typically included a company car, low-interest loans, subsidised goods and services and other benefits.

That situation encouraged the practice of salary sacrifice. An employer and employee could negotiate a total remuneration package that had a lower cash component (and therefore a lesser amount subject to tax) with the difference made up in other benefits not subject to tax. Depending on the outcome of the negotiation, the tax saving could benefit either the employer (with a lower gross cost yet the employee still receiving the same net value) or the employee (with the total gross value remaining the same, but a higher net value).

The introduction of FBT changed that. Payable by the employer, it is an important  factor in determining the total cost of employing someone. Anecdotally, the most common benefits  provided relate to motor vehicles – and often the FBT relates to the shareholder-employee of a business run through a company structure.

There are many rules and exceptions that  relate to FBT, making it a complex and time-consuming tax to deal with. It has been tinkered with over the years, most notably early last decade. At that time, the flat rate of 49% was changed to a system of specifically attributing  benefits to employees, and matching the FBT rate to each employee’s personal effective tax rate. This made doing FBT calculations even more convoluted.

Recently, the Minister of Revenue has announced proposed further changes to the FBT rules. Essentially, two main changes are planned.

The first addresses an oddity regarding the provision of car parks, arising from a general exception from FBT for certain benefits provided on the employer’s premises. If the employer provides a carpark space that is owned or specifically leased, then there is no FBT.  However, if the benefit is simply the right to any space in a facility then there is FBT as no particular space is owned or leased, and so cannot be said to be part of  the employer’s premises. The proposed changes will generally see all carparks subject to FBT (with some exceptions – of course).

The second change will ensure that certain benefits are included in assessing a person’s entitlement to social assistance (eg Working for Families, student loans, child support). Some provision for this already exists but it  is generally limited to where a person is a controlling shareholder in a company that employs them

The general exemption for charities is also  to be reviewed. Some charities have taken advantage of this loophole to significantly swap cash salaries for benefits in kind, such as grocery and petrol vouchers. While that may well comply with the “black letter” of the law, it is arguably (to paraphrase recent court decisions on tax avoidance) not quite what Parliament had in mind.

FBT is the bane of many payroll administrators. It is complicated to work with. But it is a necessary  component of a robust tax system. The proposed changes won’t make calculating FBT easier but they will further the integrity and fairness of the tax system.

Further enquiries, please contact:

Geordie Hooft
Partner, Tax
Grant Thornton New Zealand Ltd
T +64 (0)3 379 9580
E geordie.hooft@nz.gt.com

  • Follow us on Instagram
  • LinkedIn icon
  • Twitter icon
  • Facebook icon
CONNECTclose
  • Contact us
  • Make an enquiry/submit an RFP
  • Meet our people
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Locations
ABOUTclose
  • About Grant Thornton
  • Insights
  • Press
LEGALclose
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Sitemap

© 2021 Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL) - All rights reserved. "Grant Thornton” refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate, one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions.

    • EN