Tax Watch: Budget 2026 edition
Client alertThis special edition of Tax Watch summarises everything you need to know about Budget 2026.
By: Sam O'Connor, Denise Paterson, Tomas Stuart
29 Apr 2025 7 min read

With 75 pages detailing options for change, Inland Revenue appears to be moving to a "close enough is good enough" approach to FBT.
Simplifying classifications, removing logbook requirements, and aligning exemptions with practical business realities should ease compliance for many employers. However, some of the changes like vehicle revaluations and tiered rates based on fuel type, could increase the administrative burden on some businesses. Overall, the direction is positive, but careful implementation and clear guidance will be key to ensuring the reforms achieve their goal of reducing ambiguity without adding new complexity.
Motor vehicles is the largest category in the FBT regime, and is perhaps the most complex and confusing for businesses due to the stringent criteria for what qualifies as a work-related vehicle. There are also rules governing exempt days, which apply even when a vehicle is available but not in use, including situations where an employee is on holiday, and the vehicle remains at home.
The proposed adjustments are:
|
Category
|
Requirements
|
Proposed rate
|
|
1
|
|
100%
|
|
2
|
|
35%
|
|
3
|
|
0%
|
The main difference between Category 2 and 3 vehicles is employee travel patterns. If an employee works at a fixed location, home-to-work travel is private, making it Category 2. For employees who travel straight to various job sites (eg, builders) the vehicle would likely be classified as Category 3 and exempt from FBT.
To prevent major shareholder-employees from misusing this, Category 2 vehicles must have a cost base under $80,000, given their influence over vehicle use.
Additionally, "incidental travel," would be defined as rare, short, ad hoc, and non-remunerative, and the occasional use of incidental travel would not attract FBT or affect the vehicle's classification.
Unclassified benefits cover small, occasional perks like flowers, Christmas gifts, or store discounts, with current FBT exemptions capped at $300 per employee per quarter or $22,500 annually for an organisation.
To improve clarity and reduce administrative complexity, Inland Revenue has proposed removal of the current thresholds and replacing them with an exemption for benefits under $200 (GST inclusive) if benefits are provided infrequently and are unrelated to pay. This aims to remove small one-off items such as flowers from the regime, while ensuring larger items such as gym memberships are still captured.
Alternatively, creating a list exempt benefits for items such as flowers and token gifts has also been proposed.
Entertainment tax rules are a significant compliance headache for businesses, second only to FBT. Ambiguities in defining whether items are a fringe benefit or deductible such as lunch outings versus gift cards for the same venue add to the confusion.
The proposed changes aim to streamline this by incorporating entertainment under the FBT regime, with a $200 per employee exemption. A new "entertainment" category taxed at a flat rate of 49.25% would cover benefits for both employees and non-employees, while simplifying GST adjustments by consolidating them into the FBT return process.
Food and beverages that are not consumed at a party or other social occasion/celebration (ie, teamwork lunches) would be exempt from FBT.
Other recommendations in the submission include an option to pay FBT for quarters one to three based on 25% of the prior year’s liability, with a final reconciliation in quarter four.
IRD is also proposing to move stored value cards (ie, Prezzy Cards) from the PAYE regime to the FBT regime, as well as changes to dealing with global insurance policies treating the payment as a pooled benefit.
We have seen a 50% rise in audit activity in the first half of the financial year. This trend appears to be reflected in the submission, with proposed changes to increase monitoring including a requirement to detail the benefits provided and a disclosure in the income tax return to confirm if an FBT return is filed.
Inland Revenue has also commenced a digital advertising campaign targeting common FBT errors, and may focus on particular industries such as construction. Getting it right before being targeted by Inland Revenue will mitigate potential penalties.
With the 3 June 2025 filing deadline approaching, it's a great time to consider alternate rate calculations for non-cash benefits given to employees, such as:
The full alternate rate calculation adjusts the attributed tax rate from 63.93% to employees' marginal tax rates, benefiting those earning under $180k. However, this year’s changes to income tax brackets (31 July 2024) while FBT brackets remain unchanged until 1 April 2025 has resulted in a new formula to determine attribution benefits. This adds risks if you’re rolling forward outdated workpapers, so an accurate review is key.
This special edition of Tax Watch summarises everything you need to know about Budget 2026.
A global minimum tax has been introduced, which ensures that large multinationals pay at least 15% tax in all the jurisdictions they operate. This will have the effect of “reducing the incentive for profit shifting and placing a floor under tax competition, bringing an end to the race to the bottom on corporate tax rates,” as the OECD explains.
For retirement villages, there’s one area of complexity where the correct treatment can really pay dividends, and that’s GST. However, it can get complicated for retirement village operators; it’s easy to get wrong and can be very expensive to fix.