-
Compliance and audit reviews
From mandates, best practice procedures or accreditations, to simply gaining peace of mind, our technical and industry experts have you covered.
-
External audit
Strengthen business and stakeholder confidence with professionally verified results and insights.
-
Financial reporting advisory
Deep expertise to help you navigate New Zealand’s constantly evolving regulatory environment.
-
Corporate tax
Identify tax issues, risks and opportunities in your organisation, and implement strategies to improve your bottom line.
-
Indirect tax
Stay on top of the indirect taxes that can impact your business at any given time.
-
Individual tax
Preparing today to help you invest in tomorrow.
-
Private business tax structuring
Find the best tax structure for your business.
-
Tax disputes
In a dispute with Inland Revenue or facing an audit? Don’t go it alone.
-
Research & development
R&D tax incentives are often underused and misunderstood – is your business maximising opportunities for making claims?
-
Management reporting
You’re doing well, but could you be doing even better? Discover the power of management reporting.
-
Financial reporting advisory
Deep expertise to help you navigate New Zealand’s constantly evolving regulatory environment.
-
Succession planning
When it comes to a business strategy that’s as important as succession planning, you can’t afford to leave things to chance.
-
Trust management
Fresh perspectives, practical solutions and flexible support for trusts and estate planning.
-
Forecasting and budgeting
Prepare for every likely situation with robust budgeting and forecasting models.
-
Outsourced accounting services
An extension of your team when you need us, so you can focus your time, energy and passion on your business.
-
Setting up in New Zealand
Looking to set up a business in New Zealand? You’ve come to the right place.
-
Policy reviews & development
Turn your risks into strengths with tailored policies that protect, guide and empower your business.
-
Performance improvement
Every business has untapped potential. Unlock yours.
-
Programme & project management
Successfully execute mission-critical changes to your organisation.
-
Strategy
Make a choice about your vision and purpose, where you will play and how you will win – now and into the future.
-
Risk
Manage risks with confidence to support your strategy.
-
Cloud services
Leverage the cloud to keep your data safe, operate more efficiently, reduce costs and create a better experience for your employees and clients.
-
Data analytics
Use your data to make better business decisions.
-
IT assurance
Are your IT systems reliable, safe and compliant?
-
Cyber resilience
As the benefits technology can deliver to your business increases, so too do the opportunities for cybercriminals.
-
Virtual asset advisory
Helping you navigate the world of virtual currencies and decentralised financial systems.
-
Virtual CSO
Security leadership and expertise when you need it.
-
Debt advisory
Raise, refinance, restructure or manage debt to achieve the optimal funding structure for your organisation.
-
Financial modelling
Understand the impact of your decisions before you make them.
-
Raising finance
Access the best source of funding for your business with a sound business strategy and rigorous planning.
-
Business valuations
Valuable decisions require valued insights.
-
Complex and international services
Navigate the complexities of multi-jurisdictional insolvencies.
-
Corporate insolvency
Achieve fair and orderly outcomes if your business – or part of it - is facing insolvency.
-
Independent business review
Is your business viable today? Will it be viable tomorrow? Give your business a health check to find out.
-
Litigation support
Straight forward advice from trusted advisors to support litigation and arbitration matters, expert determinations and other specialist hearings.
-
Business valuations
Valuable decisions require valued insights.
-
Forensic accounting & dispute advisory
Understand the true values, numbers and dollars at stake, as well as your obligations and rights to ensure value is preserved and complexities are managed.
-
Expert witness
Our expert witnesses analyse, interpret, summarise and present complex financial and business-related issues which are understandable and properly supported.
-
Investigation services
A fast and customised response when misconduct occurs in your business.
As I gaze up at the beautiful 1906 heritage property a friend of mine owns in the centre of Wellington, it’s hard to believe all the problems it’s causing him. Although it’s 100’s of kilometres away from Christchurch, the effects of the 22 February 2011 earthquake have hit this property hard.
Around the country insurance rates have skyrocketed – most notably for earthquake prone buildings (EPBs) such as this one. The Building Act defines an EPB as a building that would be likely to collapse during a moderate earthquake causing injury, death or damage to another property and the Act delegates local authorities to adopt specific policy to address these buildings. Several years ago, the Wellington City Council gave owners of EPBs in the region up to 20 years to complete the required strengthening. The 1906 heritage property is part of a body corporate and following the strengthening notification adequate budgeting was established to allow the required work to be performed in the next 15 years.
Since then, the impact of the Canterbury earthquakes has changed things dramatically. Tenants have becomes more savvy about selecting properties which are considered safe, values of EPBs have plunged and Councils have become more vigilant. Wellington City Council expressed a desire to review current policy and extend its role beyond regulatory functions. Gisborne District Council proposed a major change in the time period allowed for the completion of strengthening work – from 25 to10 years. Even Auckland City Council, in a city of comparatively low seismic activity, responded by proposing active implementation of policies surrounding strengthening work.
Insurance companies have matched their concern. It wasn’t just the rise in premiums – many insurance companies have decided insuring EPBs simply isn’t worth the risk. Only one insurer in New Zealand agreed to insure the Wellington property in question, but that came at a cost - an annual increase in the premiums of more than 1200%. Now, my friend and the other owners are haemorrhaging money every month just to cover the insurance premiums. Suddenly the strengthening work due to be completed in 15 years has become a priority, if nothing more than to bring the insurance premium down.
Property owners are essentially backed against the wall. The cost to complete the earthquake strengthening is significant, but if they don’t do it, the ongoing insurance costs make owning the property grossly uneconomic. This is a nationwide problem. A report to the Royal Commission after the Christchurch earthquake estimated that there were almost 4,000 unreinforced masonry buildings around New Zealand and that getting them up to code will cost around $2 billion. To add insult to injury, any costs incurred in the requisite strengthening work will be considered capital expenditure from a tax perspective and non-deductible (for those owners that use the property to generate income). Well established case law has considered this issue in depth. With the recent removal of depreciation on buildings – any costs incurred by landlords and business owners will represent ‘blackhole’ expenditure.
This Budget presents the perfect opportunity for the Government to introduce tax based policies to incentivise property owners to carry out earthquake strengthening work on their properties sooner rather than later. Using tax incentives to alter behaviour is not a new concept, and if adequately structured it can produce positive outcomes for the wider economy. For example, a tax rebate could be offered on every dollar spent on qualifying strengthening work performed within a prescribed timeframe (say a five year window). Such an incentive would undoubtedly accelerate property owners’ decision making processes, while increasing building activity over the incentive period.
The reality is the $2 billion spend required to get these properties up to standard would stimulate the New Zealand economy over the incentive period – something that is desperately needed. Many industries have been relying on the Christchurch rebuild, which still isn’t happening yet and may not start for another few years. If there were other projects to engage construction workers, engineers and other experts, this would generate growth in the economy and keep those workers employed until the Christchurch rebuild is ready to begin.
It may be that amending the tax treatment of such costs on its own would not be enough to generate the desired acceleration on the required strengthening. Another area where property owners will no doubt be struggling is their ability to finance such significant expenditure. Wellington Council is considering ways they can help property owners – through interest free loans, targeted rates and other measures. However, to be truly effective, help needs to come from Central Government. Policy officials need to consider how to offer financing assistance to effected property owners in a meaningful way to aid these strengthening works - perhaps an underwritten government funding line with a charge over the property for recoupment (such as a suspensory loan)?
It’s not just the economic cost that should be encouraging the Government to consider these measures – but also the social cost. Forty-two people died due to partial failings of unreinforced masonry buildings in the Christchurch earthquake. Waiting up to 15 years to strengthen New Zealand’s unreinforced masonry buildings only increases the likelihood of more lives being lost unnecessarily. The Government needs to pro-actively encourage property owners to strengthen their properties now so they are safe for people to reside and work in. Using the tax system to incentivise this behaviour in conjunction with providing realistic financing options will have this desired effect.
The Government has shown their willingness to assist with earthquake related costs. The purchase of AMI and the decision to offer a buyout option to those who fell within the red zone are both things the Government didn’t have to do – but they felt a social responsibility and decided to assist. Providing tax incentives and financing options would be another positive step in this direction.
In Budget 2012 the Government needs to address this issue by acknowledging the extent of the economic and social pressures this situation is placing on property owners. Ultimately, introducing tax incentives and suitable financing options to encourage building strengthening is going to cost the Government a lot less than cleaning up the social and economic mess caused by the thousands of unreinforced buildings if another disaster was to occur.This national issue requires Government intervention now – if adequate policies are established, it could generate the stimulation our economy urgently needs.
Further enquiries, please contact:
Dan Lowe
Tax, Associate
T +64 9 308 2531
E dan.lowe@nz.gt.com