INSIGHT

Is your financial reporting framework keeping pace with your business?

By: Farrah Wegner

You may be preparing special purpose financial statements (SPFR) because the framework has worked well for you historically.
Contents

However, as your businesses evolves, your reporting requirements are likely to change as well.

Expansion, overseas ownership, acquisitions, funding arrangements and future sale plans can all create a need for stronger financial reporting. In some cases, you may be required to transition to NZ IFRS or the NZ IFRS Reduced Disclosure Regime (RDR). Or you might choose to adopt NZ IFRS voluntarily to support growth and meet stakeholder expectations. 

For many businesses, transitioning to NZ IFRS is not simply about compliance. It can improve transparency, support decision-making and help position the business for future opportunities.

Many organisations adopt NZ IFRS before they are legally required to do so. As your business grows, lenders, investors, boards and overseas stakeholders often expect financial information that is more consistent and aligned with international standards.

In New Zealand, entities are generally required to adopt NZ IFRS-based reporting if they are considered "large". This is where revenue exceeds $33 million or assets exceed $66 million, with lower thresholds for overseas-owned entities, which are $11 million and $22 million respectively. An entity must exceed the relevant threshold for two consecutive financial years before the requirement applies.

Five signs your reporting needs may be evolving

Many businesses find their reporting needs evolve before a transition becomes mandatory. Common indicators include:

  1. your bank is requesting increasingly detailed financial information
  2. investors or potential purchasers are asking additional questions about performance
  3. the business operates through several entities or subsidiaries
  4. revenue, assets or transaction complexity have increased significantly
  5. you are considering expansion, acquisitions or external investment.


None of these factors automatically mean a transition is required. However, they can be a useful signal that it may be time to reassess whether your current reporting framework is still fit for purpose.

Why stronger financial reporting matters

As businesses grow, lenders, investors and boards often need financial information that’s easier to understand, compare and that can be relied on when making decisions. NZ IFRS reporting can provide management teams and boards with better information to support strategic decision-making, capital allocation and performance monitoring. The framework can enhance confidence in financial information by improving:

  • transparency, increasing confidence in reported results by helping stakeholders better understand performance and financial position
  • comparability, making it easier for stakeholders to understand performance trends over time and compare results with similar organisations
  • credibility, particularly when raising capital, negotiating finance arrangements or undertaking transactions.

For growth-focused organisations, high-quality financial reporting can become a valuable business asset. It can help businesses have more informed conversations with lenders, investors and potential purchasers, and place them in a stronger position to pursue growth opportunities as they arise.

NZ IFRS: More than an accounting change

Transitioning to NZ IFRS involves more than updating financial statement disclosures. It may change how certain transactions are reported, and in some cases, how stakeholders view the business’ financial performance and position. 

Revenue

Your profit may be reported in a different period from when cash is received.
Under NZ IFRS, revenue is recognised as goods or services are delivered rather than simply when cash is collected. For businesses receiving upfront payments, this can significantly alter the timing of reported profits. 

Leases

Many leases are brought onto the balance sheet which increases reported assets and liabilities. This can potentially affect lending covenants and key performance metrics. For example, a business with a large property lease portfolio may see a significant increase in reported debt, even though there has been no change in the underlying cash flows. As a result, leverage ratios and covenant calculations may be quite different under NZ IFRS.

Group reporting

Businesses operating through multiple entities may need to prepare consolidated financial statements, changing how stakeholders view the size and performance of the group. 

Other areas including asset valuations, deferred tax and impairment assessments may also result in changes to reported results and balance sheet positions depending on the nature of your business.

Looking beyond transition: NZ IFRS 18 is changing financial reporting

For businesses considering a move from SPFR to NZ IFRS, it’s also worth looking ahead to NZ IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements, which comes into effect for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

Businesses planning a New Zealand transition may benefit from considering future reporting developments at the same time. Aligning systems, reporting structures and performance measures upfront can help avoid a second round of change shortly after transition.

Refer to IFRS 18: Plan now or panic later? and NZ IFRS 18: Your questions answered | Grant Thornton New Zealand for further insights into NZ IFRS 18.

Why timing matters

Transitioning to NZ IFRS is not something that can be left until year-end. 

The greatest challenge is rarely a single accounting standard. Instead, it’s often the cumulative effect of multiple changes across systems, processes, reporting and governance.

Early planning can help businesses allocate resources efficiently, minimise disruption and achieve a smoother transition.

The process frequently requires 12-18 months of preparation, particularly if your:

  • historical information needs to be reconstructed
  • systems or chart of accounts require redesign
  • accounting policies need to be reassessed
  • existing business structures need review
  • internal processes and controls require enhancement.
  • judgements and key accounting assumptions need to be documented and supported; this may involve developing impairment models, preparing business combination or purchase price allocations, which often require additional analyses and information gathering

Future reporting requirements such as IFRS 18 need to be incorporated into implementation planning.

Where to from here? 

Not every business will need to transition to NZ IFRS immediately. However, many organisations discover the need to transition only after experiencing significant growth, ownership changes, funding discussions or strategic transactions. By that stage, flexibility, time and control are often limited.

Assessing your reporting framework before these events occur can provide greater flexibility, reduce implementation costs and helps you avoid unnecessary disruption. It also allows organisations to prepare for emerging reporting developments such as NZ IFRS 18.

If your business is growing, attracting investment, expanding internationally or considering future exit opportunities, now may be the right time to ask a simple question: Is our current reporting framework still supporting where the business is heading?