• Skip to content
  • Skip to navigation
Global site
  • Meet our people
    • Audit
      • Audit
      • Compliance and audit reviews
      • External audit
      • Financial reporting advisory
    • Tax
      • Tax
      • Corporate tax
      • Indirect tax
      • Individual tax
      • Private business tax structuring
      • Tax disputes
      • Research & development
    • Business services
      • Business services
      • Management reporting
      • Financial reporting advisory
      • Succession planning
      • Trust management
      • Forecasting and budgeting
      • Outsourced accounting services
      • Setting up in New Zealand
    • Management consulting
      • Management consulting
      • Policy reviews & development
      • Performance improvement
      • Programme & project management
      • Strategy
      • Risk
    • Modern digital resiliency
      • Modern digital resiliency
      • Modern data protection & recovery
      • RiskOps
      • CtrlOps
      • FinOps
      • Cloud InfraOps
      • Digital infrastructure
    • Digital advisory
      • Digital advisory
      • Cloud services
      • Data analytics
      • IT assurance
      • Cyber resilience
      • Virtual asset advisory
      • Virtual CSO
    • Finance & funding
      • Finance & funding
      • Debt advisory
      • Financial modelling
      • Raising finance
      • Business valuations
    • Deals
      • Deals
      • Business valuations
      • Mergers & acquisitions
      • Transaction advisory
      • Capital markets
      • Financial modelling
    • Insolvency
      • Insolvency
      • Complex and international services
      • Corporate insolvency
    • Restructuring & turnaround
      • Restructuring & turnaround
      • Independent business review
      • Litigation support
    • Forensics
      • Forensics
      • Business valuations
      • Forensic accounting & dispute advisory
      • Expert witness
      • Investigation services
  • Insights
    • Financial services
    • Not for profit
    • Property & construction
    • Public sector
    • Retirement villages & aged care
  • Careers
    • Working at Grant Thornton
      • Working at Grant Thornton
      • Benefits & flexibility
      • Your career development
      • Diversity, equity & inclusion
    • Experienced hires
      • Experienced hires
      • The application process
      • FAQs
    • Early careers
      • Early careers
      • Graduates
      • Internships
      • Our service lines
      • The application process
      • FAQs
  • Events
  • Locations
Global site
  1. Home
  2. Press releases
  3. 2014
  4. Budget 2014: Will there be an aged care facility available when you need it?

Budget 2014: Will there be an aged care facility available when you need it?

24 Apr 2014

2014

In this year’s Budget, the Government needs to give serious consideration to bridging the gap between investment and return for those looking to build new aged care facilities.

In 2010, the Grant Thornton Aged Residential Care Service Review predicted that by 2026 between 12,000 and 20,000 new residents would require aged residential care. It predicted the need to increase new beds in the sector by between 78% and 110% by 2026 to accommodate this increased demand and to replace aging facilities.

Approximately half the current aged care building stock is now over 20 years old. While the expected upswing in demand heralded by our 2010 study was not predicted to start biting until 2014, the timing of the report meant there was a three-year window to start tackling the problem. That window is rapidly closing and building new aged care facilities is now increasingly about playing catch up rather than being ahead of the demand curve.

Since 2010 we have seen some new aged care beds added in the sector, particularly in conjunction with new retirement villages seeking to offer residents care in a retirement village setting. The number of facilities that now charge residents premiums for services has also grown as operators respond to resident demand for greater choice. New offers around providing care within a retirement village contractual model have also been bought to market. The Not for Profit sector continues to invest in aged residential care facilities.

The debate around meeting future demand needs to be considered by the various segments of the market. Most of the above examples of new supply have an element of user pays that means that the return to the operator is superior to that from a pure subsidy-based stand-alone aged care facility. That return helps to justify the investment required to provide new capacity to the market. These facilities cater for those that can afford to pay extra.

But what about those people that cannot afford to pay extra? Many New Zealanders will reach the time they require aged care services without a large nest egg. Will there be aged care facilities for those people?

A large number of stand-alone facilities have closed since our 2010 report. This is not surprising given the review identified a significant number of operators who were not viable at the current level of subsidy funding. These facilities were most likely not charging premiums or part of a retirement village. The facilities that replace this capacity will need to provide a sufficient return to justify the investment required.

One of the greatest barriers to meeting demand is that current financial returns for aged residential care operations that are reliant on subsidy funding alone are insufficient to support investment in building new capacity and replacing aging facilities. The Government needs to address this issue in the Budget now. The level of subsidy in general will need to increase significantly if this gap is to be bridged. Specific adjustments related to end of life care and dementia should be made.

There are also options around how this capacity can be supplied. Financial structures around the different components of aged residential care services (namely accommodation, hotel and care) and determining the appropriate funder for the different costs could be explored. Australia is developing along an individualised funding model for health that may provide some policy pointers. The Not for Profit sector is playing a part in the development of new capacity and this will need to continue, but this part of the sector is unlikely to be able to build all the capacity required. Looking at a capitation approach for certain geographic areas where there is demand also needs to be considered.

The Budget needs to clearly quantify the impending demand for care for our elderly and establish pricing and policy settings that will ensure that our older generation is cared for with dignity and in a place that we will be happy for ourselves, our parents and our grandparents to live.

Further enquiries, please contact:

Martin Gray
Grant Thornton New Zealand, Head of Lead Advisory, Corporate Finance
T +64 (0)9-308-2983
E martin.gray@nz.gt.com

CONNECT CONNECT

  • Contact us
  • Meet our people
  • Careers
  • Locations

ABOUT ABOUT

  • About Grant Thornton
  • Insights
  • Gender pay gap and gender pay equity
  • Press

LEGAL LEGAL

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Sitemap
  • Cookie Preferences

Follow usFollow us

© 2025 Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL) - All rights reserved. "Grant Thornton” refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate, one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions.